The Various Articles of Markup Languages for those things which are structured

(X)HTML

  1. The Definition Title

    Or, How to add Dunstan Diaz's Sweet Titles to the HTML Phrase definition <dfn> element.

  2. They aren’t HTML5 docs in the first place

    Or, Document Type Delcaration (DTDs) are incidental elements when validation efforts are performed. Validation occurs from valid content: markup languages and stylesheets. Occasionally, valid content will be HTML, XHTML and HTML compliant regardless of which DTD was used..

  3. How to Semantically Expand the Markup of Lists

    Or, An example of a semantically-structured list that uses headers and paragraphs.

  4. Why Use HTML5?

    Or, The purpose of this article regards using WHAT WG HTML5 (as it exists on January 24, 2007) which includes a selected History Lesson as to how it originated and what may occur.

  5. HTML5 Doctype is Unrecognized

    Or, Web Application 1.0 (or, HTML5) has simplified the Document Type Declaration whereby it renders web pages in standards-compliant mode, does not require definition and is unrecognizable.

  6. HTML and XHTML are Identical in HTML5

    Or, The WHAT WG has devised a simple method of document handling which mutes the argument between use of HTML 4.01 or XHTML 1.0.

  7. And All That HTML5 Malarkey

    Or, A case study wherein Andy Clarke's “And All That Malarkey” XHTML undergoes six interations before it becomes HTML5 compliant.

  8. HTML5 Anchor Difference

    Or, A small difference between HTML 4.01 and HTML 5 as regards anchors, significant text and embedded content.

  9. HTML5 Image Difference

    Or, A small difference between HTML 4.01 and HTML 5 as regards images and embedded content.

  10. (X)HTML5 Character Encoding

    Or, Ian Hickson offers clarification regarding a present-day misconception of the (X)HTML5 speicification's allowance for UTF-8 character sets only.

  11. WHAT Working Group boils Ocean!

    Or, The Web Hypertext Application Technology (WHAT) Working Group (WG) Mailing List has this thread. Everyone should read this thread. It's titled “HTML5 should allow for the empty element syntax.” It's very informative. It discusses greater things than singleton self-closed HTML elements.

  12. Yahoo! recommends HTML 4

    Or, The Yahoo! Developer Network offers its recommendation that all sites should be constructed with HTML 4.01/Strict for rendering standards mode in user agents. That Yahoo! recommends HTML rather than XHTML has a fundamental significance for Markup Language Purists (even though individual Yahoo! Teams fail to follow it).

  13. Why do You use HTML 4?

    Or, Web developer replies from a small questionnaire sent to CSS Reboot Spring 2006 participants and commenter's on 456 Berea Street regarding the use of HTML 4.01 on their sites.

  14. The Most Common HTML Markup Errors

    Or, The most common and prevalent errors found in HTML Markup code of sites which participated in CSS Reboot Spring 2006.

  15. XHTML’s Gift

    Or, An Introductory Article regarding websites that use HTML 4.01.

  16. Why XHTML™?

    Or, Which DTD should be used? Persuasive arguments abound. This article represents a less academic resolution of this web standards conundrum.

Every person who wishes to see other articles regarding Web Standards and cannot yet secure it easily from this page, may receive a sample of either the Site Standards or the Engine Machinations pages, or assorted ephemera in Philologia and Errata, when the newest items are not sufficient as found on the Home page.

The Elementary Standards